Kateyo v Makerere University (Labour Dispute Reference No. 187 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Industrial Court declined to award interest on a settled retirement benefits claim where the claimant failed to file submissions within agreed timelines. The court held that the award of interest is discretionary under Civil Procedure Act s.20, and the claimant's failure to comply with court-ordered timelines demonstrated that interest was not necessary. The burden to establish entitlement to interest rested on the claimant, which was not discharged.
Outcome
Application for interest dismissed; settled sum of UGX 35,096,621 stands without interest
Facts
The claimant filed a claim for UGX 226,884,010 as retirement benefits. On 17 February 2020, the parties settled out of court for UGX 35,096,621, but disagreed on whether interest should be paid. The court set timelines for filing submissions: claimant by 16 August 2021, respondent by 20 August 2021, and rejoinder by 8 September 2021. The claimant filed submissions on 8 September 2021, three weeks late. The respondent did not file submissions. When the court convened on 10 September 2021 to discuss submissions, only the claimant's late submissions were on file. The court declined to consider them due to the delay and absence of the respondent's submissions.
Issues
- Whether interest is payable on the settled sum of retirement benefits.
- If interest is payable, at what rate and from which date.
Orders
- No interest accrues on the settled amount already paid into the claimant's accounts.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Cases cited (1)
- Uganda Revenue Authority v Stephen Mabosi (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1996)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.