Katushabe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 639 of 2014)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Where an accused's 'apparent age' is a borderline 18, the Children Act presumes childhood and obliges the court to inquire into age before sentencing.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Katushabe applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.