Kaweesi Gerald Kamya v Kakise Fish Co. Limited (Miscellaneous Application No. 546 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court dismissed the application for leave to amend the written statement of defence. The proposed amendment sought to recharacterise the transaction from a purchase and sale agreement into a joint venture, which would constitute a substantial departure from the original defence and alter the cause of action. The court held that the contract's clear language established a buyer-seller relationship, not a joint venture, and allowing the amendment would work an injustice on the respondent and constitute an abuse of process.
Outcome
Application for leave to amend defence dismissed with costs to the respondent
Facts
The applicant sought leave to amend his written statement of defence in a pending civil suit arising from a purchase and sale agreement dated 17 December 2020 for fishing gears valued at UGX 227,150,000. The applicant claimed his previous lawyers had distorted the facts and that the transaction was actually a joint venture where the respondent contributed fishing gear and the applicant was to sell them with proceeds shared between the parties. The respondent opposed, arguing the agreement clearly established a purchase and sale transaction with defined payment terms. The main suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 23 February 2022 and reinstated on 20 July 2023. Witness statements had already been filed in the main suit.
Issues
- Whether the Applicant has shown grounds entitling him to be granted leave to amend his Written Statement of Defense in the main suit?
Orders
- The Application is dismissed.
- The Applicant shall pay the costs of this application.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (7)
Cases cited (16)
- Charles Kamudda v F. X. Mubuuke (Miscellaneous Application No. 230 of 2022)
- Tushabe Chris v Cooperative Bank Limited (in Liquidation) (Civil Application No. 08 of 2018)
- Mulowoza Brothers Ltd v N. Shah & Co. Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 26 of 2010)
- Gaso Transport Services (Bus) Ltd v Martin Adala Obene [1990-1994] EA 88
- Eastern Bakery v Castelino [1958] 1 EA 461
- Nicholas Sserunkuma Ssewagudde & 2 Others v Namasole Namusoke Namatovu Veronica (Miscellaneous Application No. 1307 of 2016)
- Jani Properties Ltd v Dar-es-salaam City Council [1966] EA 281
- Struggle Ltd v Pan African Insurance Co. Ltd [1990] ALR 46
- Space Marketing Uganda Limited v Equifax Uganda Limited and others (Miscellaneous Application No. 969 of 2020)
- Soft Sheen Carson v William Fugar [2014] 79 GMJ 162 CA
- Senyonga v Kakoza (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 9 of 1990)
- Jiwaji v Jiwaji [1968] EA 547
- Lulume v C.M. Board [1970] EA 155
- Savings and Loans (Kenya) Limited v Mayfair Holdings Limited [2012] eKLR
- Johnson Akol Omunyokol v Attorney General, Application No. 3 of 2016(Arising from Reference No. 1 of 2015) East African Court of Justice
- Sarah Nyakato v Lin Jeng Liang aka Lin Jeff and 5 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 216 of 2022)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.