Kefa Sempagi v Francis Babu and Others (ML 86 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application dismissed for non-attendance of parties under Order 9 rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The matter was fixed at the request of counsel for the applicant, but neither party appeared and no reason was given for their absence.
Outcome
Application dismissed for non-attendance
Facts
The matter was a miscellaneous land application arising from a taxation application, which itself arose from an earlier civil suit. The application was fixed for hearing on 11 September 2025 at the request of counsel for the applicant. On the scheduled date, neither party appeared in court and no explanation was provided for their non-attendance.
Orders
- Application dismissed under Order 9 rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Legislation cited (1)
- Civil Procedure Rules O.9 r.17
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.