Kemisa v Mohammed Jaffer Limited (Civil Application 3 of 1997)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
An application dismissed for want of prosecution was restored under rule 55(3) where counsel's vehicle breakdown was sufficient cause and the respondent was compensable in costs.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kemisa applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.