Kenneth Buyinza and Another v Kimera Henry (Miscellaneous Cause No. 35 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed the miscellaneous cause as irregular because no notice of motion was filed on record. The court held that the absence of a notice of motion rendered the application procedurally defective and incapable of being entertained.
Outcome
Cause dismissed
Facts
The applicants filed a miscellaneous cause on 6 March 2024. No notice of motion was placed on the court record. The matter came before the court for determination of its procedural regularity.
Issues
- Whether the cause was properly constituted in the absence of a notice of motion
Orders
- Cause dismissed as irregular for want of notice of motion.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.