Khan v Fatima (P. & A. Cause 6-1929 (Nakuru).)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that a Mohammedan can make a valid oral will under Mohammedan law as applied in Kenya. Two witnesses are required. Where a reputable witness is supported by other witnesses, the court may find both that a will was made and that its contents are proved. The court may accept the evidence of the reputable witness even where it differs from other witnesses. The oral will of Faiz Khan was admitted to probate in solemn form.
Outcome
Oral will admitted to probate; probate granted to applicant
Facts
Faiz Khan died on 28 April 1929. The applicant Sardar Khan alleged that a few days before his death, Faiz Khan made an oral will in the presence of several people including Dr John Peter Andrews. The will appointed Sardar Khan as executor and made specific bequests. The respondent Gulam Fatima, the wife of the deceased, denied being present and alleged the witnesses were putting forward a concocted story. The applicant sought admission of the oral will to probate in solemn form. The court heard evidence from multiple witnesses including the doctor, whose credibility was challenged by the respondent on the basis that all other witnesses had motives or interests.
Issues
- Whether an oral will can be made by a Mohammedan under the law applicable in Kenya.
- Whether the alleged oral will of Faiz Khan was validly made and proved.
- Whether the evidence of witnesses, including a reputable witness, was sufficient to establish both the making and contents of the oral will.
Orders
- Oral will of Faiz Khan declared proved in solemn form.
- Probate granted to the applicant Sardar Khan.
- Costs of all parties to come out of the whole estate of the deceased.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Indian Succession Act No. 10 of 1865 s.2
- Indian Succession Act No. 10 of 1865 s.331
- Mohammedan Divorce and Succession Ordinance Chapter 171 Laws of Kenya s.4
Cases cited (2)
- Sugden v Lord St Leonards (1 P.D. 154)
- Woodward v Goulstone (11 A.C. 469)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.