Khaukha Paul Isaac v Uganda National Roads Authority (Miscellaneous Application No. 04 of 2024)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
An application for an order compelling a government agency to comply with a consent judgment was dismissed where the applicant failed to extract and serve a Certificate of Order against the government. Following Goodman Agencies Ltd, the court held that mandamus will only issue upon refusal to honor a duly served Certificate of Order. Lack of funding does not excuse non-compliance with court orders, but proper procedural requirements must be met before the court can compel performance.
Outcome
Application dismissed for failure to extract and serve Certificate of Order against government agency
Facts
The Applicant sued the Respondent and Arab Contractors in Civil Suit No. 14 of 2021 for negligence and nuisance arising from a broken and diverted drainage channel that damaged his property at Namisindwa Guest House. The suit was settled by consent on 14 December 2022. Arab Contractors paid UGX 110,000,000 for damage and costs. The consent order required UNRA to temporarily rectify the drainage channel within two months and permanently rectify it within six months. The consent was entered by court on 21 December 2022. UNRA failed to comply despite several reminders. The Applicant brought this application to compel compliance and sought damages. UNRA claimed insufficient funding due to dependence on government releases. The Applicant did not extract or serve a Certificate of Order against the government before bringing the application.
Issues
- Whether the Respondent should be compelled to comply with the terms of the consent order executed on 14/12/2022 and entered by the Court on 21/12/2022.
- Whether the Applicant is entitled to general and punitive damages arising out of the Respondent's default.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Each party to bear its own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (6)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Act s.34
- Judicature Act Cap 13 s.33
- Judicature Act Cap 16 s.37
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 R.1
- Civil Procedure Rules O.52 R.3
Cases cited (2)
- Goodman Agencies Ltd & 3 Others v Attorney General & Treasury Officer of Accounts (Miscellaneous Application No. 126 of 2008)
- Intex Construction Ltd v Attorney General & Anor (Miscellaneous Application No. 737 of 2013)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.