Kibirango Julius v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 228 of 2016)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A sentence expressed as a term 'inclusive of remand' is too ambiguous to satisfy Article 23(8) and is illegal; sentence set aside and remand period deducted.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kibirango Julius applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.