Wakilii

Kibirige & Another (Administrators of the estate of the late Yowana Birigwa) v Waswa & Another (Miscellaneous Cause 134 of 2024)

High Court · [2025] UGHCLD 49 · 2025 Application Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application by notice of motion seeking delivery of certificate of title and compensation
Decision
Application dismissed for being improperly brought before court

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that an application by notice of motion seeking delivery of a land certificate of title and compensation was improperly brought before court where the averments raised triable issues requiring viva voce evidence, cross-examination, and inclusion of all necessary parties. The dispute involved contested facts about possession of the certificate, alleged unauthorised negotiations with land dealers, and claims for substantial compensation that could not be determined on affidavit evidence alone. Application dismissed with no order as to costs.

Outcome

Application dismissed for being improperly brought before court

Facts

The applicants were administrators of the estate of the late Yowana Birigwa and registered proprietors of land comprised in Busiro Block 263 Plot 123 at Kayunga. They faced a land dispute with dealers and filed Civil Suit No. 395 of 2023 with a temporary injunction. Seeking assistance, they deposited the certificate of title with the 1st respondent who worked with the Ministry of Lands. The applicants later discovered the 1st respondent was negotiating with land dealers about the same land. They claimed back the certificate of title. The Permanent Secretary Ministry of Lands responded that the certificate was with the 2nd respondent who was described as the applicants' lawyer, though the applicants denied this relationship. The respondents denied the allegations and stated the duplicate certificate had been handed to Mbogo & Co. Advocates for submission to the Registrar of Titles Wakiso for implementation of court orders in Civil Suit No. 395 of 2023.

Issues

  1. Whether the instant application is properly before this court?

Orders

  • Application dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Notice of Motion — Proper Use — Requirement for Triable Issues to be Determined by Plaint
Notice of motions may be used where the law specifically permits them or where a statute provides for an application but does not expressly provide special procedure. However, where an application raises triable issues requiring substantial viva voce evidence, cross-examination of witnesses, and inclusion of all necessary parties, such matters cannot properly be determined by notice of motion and must be instituted by plaint.
Civil Procedure — Evidence — Affidavit Evidence — Limitations Where Facts Are Contested
Where parties raise contested averments that require scrutiny, analysis of witness testimony, and determination of factual disputes such as possession of property, authorisation of transactions, and basis for compensation claims, such issues cannot be properly determined on affidavit evidence alone and require a full trial with viva voce evidence.

Legislation cited (5)

Cases cited (2)

  • St. Benoit Plantation Ltd v Jean Emile Adrien Felix (EACA Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1954)
  • Re; Christine Namatovu Tibaiijjukira (1992-93) HCB 85

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kibirige_&_Another_(Administrators_of_the_estate_of_the_late_Yowana_Birigwa)_v_Waswa_&_Another_(Miscellaneous_Cause_134_of_2024)_[2025]_UGHCLD_49_(14_March_2025)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.