Wakilii

Kiboko Enterprises Limited v Kimbugwe (Miscellaneous Application 139 of 2023)

Industrial Court · [2024] UGIC 12 · 2024 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for interim stay of execution of Industrial Court award pending appeal to Court of Appeal
Decision
Interim stay of execution granted pending hearing of main application for stay

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Industrial Court granted an interim stay of execution of its award pending the hearing of the main application for stay. The Court held that the notice of appeal was filed within time when the Christmas vacation period was excluded from the computation of time. The Court declined to determine the propriety of the appeal, holding that such jurisdiction lies with the Court of Appeal. The Court found that there was a pending substantive application with arguable grounds, a status quo to be preserved, and that the applicant had satisfied the threshold for interim relief.

Outcome

Interim stay of execution granted pending hearing of main application for stay

Facts

The applicant, Kiboko Enterprises Ltd, sought an interim stay of execution of an Industrial Court award in Labour Appeal No. 13 of 2023 pending an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The respondent, Abdallah Kimbugwe, opposed the application and raised preliminary objections challenging the competence of the appeal, the late filing of the notice of appeal, the absence of a power of attorney for the deponent, and want of instructions for the law firm that filed the affidavit in rejoinder. The applicant had filed a notice of appeal on 23 January 2023 against an award rendered on 22 December 2022. The respondent had applied for execution of the award. The applicant filed both a main application for stay of execution and this application for interim stay.

Issues

  1. Whether the notice of appeal was filed out of time.
  2. Whether the memorandum of appeal offends Rule 23(2) of the Industrial Court Rules by not being on a point of law or jurisdiction.
  3. Whether KMT Advocates had instructions to file the affidavit in rejoinder.
  4. Whether the deponent required a power of attorney to depone to the affidavit in support.
  5. Whether the applicant is entitled to an interim order of stay of execution pending the determination of the main application.

Orders

  • The order of interim stay of execution is granted.
  • The interim stay shall remain in force until the hearing of Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 138 of 2023.
  • LDMA 138 of 2023 is to be fixed for hearing within 14 days of this order.
  • No order as to costs.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Time Computation — Christmas Vacation — Exclusion from Time Limits
In computing time for filing a notice of appeal, the period between 24 December and 15 January (both days inclusive) shall not be reckoned, in accordance with Order 51 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Civil Procedure — Appeals — Jurisdiction to Determine Propriety of Appeal
The Industrial Court does not have jurisdiction to determine the propriety of an appeal from its own decisions. Such jurisdiction lies with the Court of Appeal under Rule 82 of the Court of Appeal Rules, which empowers the appellate court to strike out a notice or appeal on the ground that no appeal lies or that an essential step has not been taken within the prescribed time.
Civil Procedure — Affidavits — Authority to Depone — Recognised Agents
A recognised agent or advocate deponing to an affidavit on behalf of a party is not required to furnish proof of authority to the court. The requirement to furnish proof of authority applies only where Order 1 Rule 12 of the Civil Procedure Rules is invoked.
Civil Procedure — Interim Relief — Threshold for Grant
The court shall only consider granting interim relief where there is a pending substantive application with a likelihood of success. The threshold includes demonstrating that the court has jurisdiction, that the case discloses triable issues and is not frivolous or vexatious, that failure to grant the application would render the matter nugatory in a manner that cannot be addressed through damages, and that there is a status quo to be preserved.

Legislation cited (19)

Cases cited (17)

  • Royal Mabati Ltd v Mandela Sulaiman (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 122 of 2023)
  • In the Matter of Ranch on the Lake Limited (In Receivership) (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 537 of 2005)
  • Autotune Limited v Barozi Swaldo & Ors (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 029 of 2022)
  • Herman Semakula v Ivan Assimwe (Supreme Court Civil Reference No. 04 of 2023)
  • Byeitsma and 2 Others v Asaba (Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 264 of 2013)
  • Owners of Motor Vessel Lillian 's' v Caltex Oil Kenya Limited [1989] KLR 1
  • Okodoi George and Another v Okello Opaire Sam (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 70 of 2015)
  • Mugisa M Abraham & 4 Others v Rwambuka & Co. Advocates (Miscellaneous Application No. 733 of 2018)
  • Nareeba Dan & 5 Others v Joseph Bamwebehelre & 4 Others (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 45 of 2009)
  • Electro-Maxx Uganda Ltd v Oryxx Oil Uganda Ltd (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 251 of 2020)
  • MHK Engineering Service(U) Ltd v Macdoweli Limited (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 825 of 2018)
  • Lang Wanxi v China Complant and Another (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 025 of 2023)
  • Kiyimba Kaggwa v Hajj Abdul Noor Katende [1985] HCB 43
  • Frank Malingumu Gashumba v Deborah Amanya (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 37 of 2021)
  • C.C.M JX No. 18 of 2007 Hon. Jim Muhwezl v A.G & Another
  • Absa Bank Uganda Ltd & 2 Ors v Electro-Maxx(U) Ltd & Anor (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 241 of 2020)
  • Joseph Kalule v GIZ (Labour Dispute Reference No. 109 of 2020)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kiboko_Enterprises_Limited_v_Kimbugwe_(Miscellaneous_Application_139_of_2023)_[2024]_UGIC_12_(29_January_2024)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.