Kijjambu v Wamala Growers Co-operatives (Labour Dispute Claim 31 of 2015)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Industrial Court held that rephrasing and re-paragraphing pleadings to comply with Industrial Court procedural rules, without altering substantive content or meaning, does not constitute an amendment requiring leave under Order 6 Rule 19 CPR. Changes amounting only to correction of typing errors or reconstruction of sentences and paragraphs that do not change meaning are not amendments within the rule.
Outcome
Preliminary objection dismissed; matter to proceed to hearing on merits
Facts
The claimant sued the respondent in the High Court. The matter was subsequently transferred to the Industrial Court. Upon transfer, both parties were required under Rule 5 of the Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) (Industrial Court Procedure) Rules 2012 to file their pleadings by memorandum. The respondent converted its written statement of defense into a memorandum in reply, in the process rephrasing and re-paragraphing the content. The claimant raised a preliminary objection, alleging that the respondent had amended its defense without seeking leave of Court under Order 6 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and sought to have paragraphs 2, 3, 6(a)-(e), and 7 of the response expunged on grounds they introduced new matter not pleaded in the original defense.
Issues
- Whether the respondent amended its written statement of defense without seeking leave of Court under Order 6 Rule 19 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- Whether rephrasing and re-paragraphing pleadings without changing their substantive content constitutes an amendment requiring leave of Court.
Orders
- Preliminary objection overruled.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 6 Rule 19
- Labour Disputes (Arbitration and Settlement) (Industrial Court Procedure) Rules 2012 Rule 5
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.