Kirti Sigh Rana v Mayanja & Ors (MISC. APPEAL No. 203 of 2015)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court allowed the appeal against the Registrar's dismissal of an application for production of documentary evidence. The court directed Post Bank Jinja Branch to produce in evidence the applicant's letter dated 21 August 2008, finding that granting the orders would not prejudice any party.
Outcome
Matter remitted for production of documentary evidence by Post Bank Jinja Branch
Facts
The appellant filed an application in Civil Suit No. 60 of 2012 seeking to have a letter written to the Manager of Post Bank, Jinja Branch, produced by the Bank and tendered in evidence. The Registrar dismissed the application in Miscellaneous Application No. 451 of 2015. The appellant appealed to the High Court under Section 79 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 50 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Issues
- Whether the Registrar erred in dismissing the application to have a letter dated 21/8/2008 produced by Post Bank and tendered in evidence.
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Post Bank Jinja Branch directed to produce in evidence the applicant's letter dated 21/8/2008.
- No order as to costs.
Legislation cited (2)
- Civil Procedure Act s.79
- Civil Procedure Rules O.50 r.8
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.