Kiryowa Moses Kalinda v Sauda Nabaloga Kayima (Miscellaneous Application No. 1502 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The applicant sought to stay execution of an exparte judgment pending hearing of an application to set aside that judgment. Before the hearing, the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal stating the parties were pursuing amicable settlement and the respondent had received her certificate of title. The court discontinued the application under Order 25 Rules 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and awarded costs to the respondent.
Outcome
Application withdrawn by applicant and discontinued by court; respondent awarded costs
Facts
The applicant filed an application seeking to stay execution of an exparte judgment and decree dated 21 February 2025 in Civil Suit No. 931 of 2018 pending the hearing of Miscellaneous Application No. 1496 of 2025 to set aside that exparte judgment. The respondent filed an affidavit in reply on 8 September 2025. The application was fixed for hearing on 16 September 2025 and the court gave parties schedules for filing submissions. On 17 October 2025, counsel for the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal stating the applicant had withdrawn the application to pursue amicable settlement. The notice stated the respondent had received her certificate of title which she bought from the applicant after willfully withdrawing her caveat from the suit land that had delayed subdivision.
Orders
- The Application is hereby withdrawn/discontinued at the instance of the Applicant under Order 25, Rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules SI 71-1.
- The Respondents are awarded costs of this Application.
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.