Wakilii

Kishaija Steven v Attorney General (Misc.Cause No.15 Of 2010) (Misc.Cause No.15 of 2010)

High Court · [2010] UGHC 22 · 2010 Application Granted AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum challenging detention at Kigo Prison following remand order by General Court Martial
Decision
Applicant ordered released immediately from illegal detention at Kigo Prison

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The High Court held that the General Court Martial lacked jurisdiction to try or remand the applicant who was not a person subject to military law at the time of his arrest. Following Attorney General v Uganda Law Society, the court found the detention unlawful and ordered the applicant's immediate release from Kigo Prison with costs awarded against the Attorney General.

Outcome

Applicant ordered released immediately from illegal detention at Kigo Prison

Facts

Kishaija Steven was arrested in June 2000 from Jinja Road, Kampala, by RRU officers. He was detained at Kireka Police Barracks until 20 September 2009, when he was taken to the General Court Martial and charged with aggravated robbery. He was remanded at Kigo Prison. His wife, Atukunda Emily, swore an affidavit stating that he was not a soldier or person subject to military law, and that the Military Court Martial had no jurisdiction to try or remand him. A writ of habeas corpus was issued on 10 February 2010, requiring production of his body. The Attorney General's return stated the applicant had been found with military weapons and charged with aggravated robbery, but provided no evidence that he was subject to military law at the time of arrest.

Issues

  1. Whether the General Court Martial had jurisdiction to try and remand the applicant who was not a person subject to military law at the time of his arrest.
  2. Whether the applicant's detention at Kigo Prison was lawful.

Orders

  • Applicant to be released at once from illegal detention.
  • Costs of this application to be paid by the Attorney General.

Rules and key headnotes

Military Court Jurisdiction — Limitation to Persons Subject to Military Law
The General Court Martial is not competent to try any person unless it is shown that at the time of arrest that person was subject to military law.
Habeas Corpus — Burden of Justifying Detention
Upon presentation of the applicant and the return before court in a habeas corpus application, the respondent must justify the legality of the detention and satisfy the court that the applicant is legally detained.
Hearsay Evidence — Inadmissibility in Habeas Corpus Proceedings
An averment in an affidavit that the deponent had been informed by a third party that the applicant had been found in possession of weapons is hearsay and inadmissible as evidence to justify detention in habeas corpus proceedings.
Military Court Remand Orders — Unlawfulness Where No Jurisdiction
Where a court martial lacks jurisdiction to try an accused person who is not subject to military law, any order sending that person to remand is unlawful and the detention is illegal.

Cases cited (1)

  • Attorney General v Uganda Law Society (Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 2006)

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kishaija Steven v Attorney General (Misc.Cause No.15 Of 2010) (Misc.Cause No.15 of 2010) [2010] UGHC 22 (21 February 2010)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.