Wakilii

Kivumbi v Kampala City Council (Civil Suit No. 1471 of 2014)

High Court · [2015] UGHCCD 6 · 2015 Judgment for Plaintiff (Damages Awarded) AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
First instance civil suit for compensation arising from deprivation of licensed market premises.
Decision
Plaintiff awarded compensation for construction expenditure and general damages. Claim for mesne profits dismissed. Defendant retains responsibility for wrongful deprivation despite committee delegation.

Observed later treatment

Cited — treatment unverified cited in 1 (treatment unverified) Sequitur — Uganda’s citator · Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

No adverse treatment recorded Cited 1 time with no adverse treatment recorded; not yet tested on the merits. Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — a deterministic signal, not legal advice.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Held that a market vendor licensed to construct lock-up shops on council land acquires no proprietary interest but retains a right to utilise the premises constructed. The council's delegation of allocation functions to a development committee does not absolve it of responsibility for wrongful deprivation. Where the vendor constructs premises but is denied occupation, the vendor is entitled to compensation for construction costs and general damages, though not mesne profits without evidence of actual profits received by wrongful occupants.

Outcome

Plaintiff awarded compensation for construction expenditure and general damages. Claim for mesne profits dismissed. Defendant retains responsibility for wrongful deprivation despite committee delegation.

Facts

In 1996 the World Bank advanced a loan to Kampala City Council for the redevelopment of St. Balikuddembe Market. Under the arrangement, market vendors were responsible for constructing shops in allocated spaces. The Plaintiff constructed a storeyed shop but before completion the Defendant took over the ground floor and let it out to other vendors without compensation. The Plaintiff retained occupation of the upper floor and part of the ground floor. The present occupants paid rent to the Defendant. The Plaintiff brought suit seeking eviction of the occupants or compensation, mesne profits, general damages, and costs. The Defendant argued the suit was res judicata by reference to a consent judgment in Civil Suit No. 947 of 2001, and that the Plaintiff had no proprietary interest as he was not in occupation of the disputed space before market redevelopment.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit is time-barred by law.
  2. Whether the suit is res judicata by reason of a Consent Judgment in High Court Civil Suit No. 947 of 2001.
  3. Whether the Plaintiff has any proprietary interest in the market.
  4. Whether the Defendant permitted the Plaintiff to construct a shop in Owino Market for his exclusive ownership and use.
  5. Whether the Defendant unlawfully deprived the Plaintiff of the shop premises described in the Plaint.
  6. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought.

Orders

  • The Defendant is ordered to compensate the Plaintiff in the sum of UGX 10,000,000 being representative of the value of his expenditure on the construction of the suit premises.
  • Simple interest is granted on the above monies at 3% per annum from the date of filing of this suit until payment in full.
  • General damages are hereby awarded to the Plaintiff in the sum of UGX 7,000,000 payable at 8% interest from the date hereof until payment in full.
  • The Plaintiff is awarded four-fifth of the costs hereof, and the Defendant is awarded one-fifth thereof.

Rules and key headnotes

Civil Procedure — Closing Arguments — Order of Submissions — Procedural Flexibility
Rules of procedure are intended to be handmaidens of justice, not to defeat it. The High Court has inherent jurisdiction to waive strict application of Order 18 rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules where each party has had a fair opportunity to state its case and no prejudice results.
Civil Procedure — Res Judicata — Consent Judgment — Finality
A compromise decree or consent order does not operate as res judicata because it is merely the record of a contract between the parties, to which is superadded the seal of the court; the court does not decide anything. A matter is res judicata only where it has been heard and finally decided by a court.
Land & Property — Licences — Exclusion from Lawful Occupancy
A licence is permission to enter or occupy land for an agreed purpose and does not confer a right to exclusive possession or convey any estate or interest in the land. Under section 29(4) of the Land Act, a person on land on the basis of a licence from the registered owner shall not be taken to be a lawful or bona fide occupant.
Administrative Law — Delegation of Functions — Residual Responsibility
Where a controlling authority delegates its functions to another body, the delegation does not negate the authority's responsibility for the delegate's actions. The delegating authority remains liable for wrongful acts committed by the delegate in the exercise of delegated functions.
Contract Law — Market Licences — Right to Utilisation of Constructed Premises
Where a market vendor is licensed by a council to construct lock-up shops on council land, the vendor acquires no proprietary interest in the land but is entitled to utilisation of the shops constructed within the framework of the market development project. Deprivation of the constructed premises by allocating them to other occupants is unlawful.
Damages & Quantum — Mesne Profits — Burden of Proof
Mesne profits under section 2(m) of the Civil Procedure Act are those profits which the person in wrongful possession actually received or might with ordinary diligence have received, together with interest, but not including profits due to improvements. A claim for mesne profits must be supported by evidence of actual profits received and cannot succeed on speculation.
Civil Procedure — Costs — Costs Following the Event — Partial Success
Costs generally follow the event. Where a plaintiff succeeds on the majority of issues but the defendant succeeds on one issue, the court may apportion costs to reflect the respective degrees of success.

Legislation cited (7)

Cases cited (7)

  • Iron & Steelwares Ltd v C. W. Martyr & Co. (East African Court of Appeal 1956)
  • Kendal v Hamilton (1878) 4 AC 504
  • Karia & Another v Attorney General & Others (Supreme Court 2005)
  • Lotta v Tanaki & Others (Court of Appeal of Tanzania 2003)
  • Butagira v Mukasa (Civil Appeal No. 6 of 1989)
  • Uganda Development Bank v Muganga Construction Company (1981) HCB 35
  • Sutherland v Canada (Attorney General) 2008 BCCA 27

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kivumbi v Kampala City Council (Civil Suit No. 1471 of 2014) [2015] UGHCCD 6 (30 January 2015)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.