Kiwanuka v Nakatumba (Civil Application 566 of 2024)

Observed later treatment

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

Holding

The applicant sought a stay of execution and variation of conditions (a deposit of UGX 100,000,000 plus the certificate of title) imposed by the High Court when it granted a conditional stay. The court held that, because a subsisting order of stay already existed, a fresh application for stay was moot. The applicant had in any event already complied with the conditions by depositing the money and the title, so the complaint that the deposit was harsh could no longer be sustained. Finding no reason to vary the order, the court rejected the application.

Outcome

Application for stay of execution rejected.

Facts

The applicant filed Civil Appeal No. 1482 of 2023 challenging a decision in Civil Suit No. 039 of 2005. In February 2024 the High Court granted him a stay of execution on condition that he deposit security for costs of UGX 100,000,000 and the certificate of title to the suit land. The applicant later complied, depositing both the money and the title. Notwithstanding the stay, the Registrar of the High Court issued a ruling authorising execution of eviction orders. The applicant brought this application seeking a stay and/or setting aside of the execution arising from High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 338 of 2024, and sought to have the deposit condition (which he regarded as harsh) varied. The respondent opposed the application as frivolous and an abuse of process.

Issues

1. Whether a fresh application for stay of execution can be granted where the High Court has already issued a subsisting conditional order of stay.
2. Whether the court should vary the conditions imposed by the High Court for the stay of execution.

Orders

• The application is rejected.

Rules and key headnotes

Legislation cited (5)

• Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions rule 6(2)
• Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions rule 43(1)
• Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions rule 43(2)
• Judicature (Court of Appeal Rules) Directions rule 44(1)
• Civil Procedure Rules O.43

Cases cited (1)

• Emmanuel Kato v Muyanja Mbabati (Civil Appeal No. 345 of 2018)

Cases citing this judgment (1)

How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.

• Kate Nakatumba Kiwala Tamale v Sam Kiwanuka Walusimbi (Civil Application No. 257 of 2025)

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.