Knight Fashions Limited v I & M Bank Uganda Limited (Civil Suit 6 of 2019)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where a plaintiff amends a plaint to increase the value of the subject matter, the court fees paid must be proportional to the increased value. The court has discretionary power under Rule 6 of the Judicature (Court Fees, Fines and Deposits) Rules to order payment of proper fees where a document was received without proper fees being paid through mistake or inadvertence.
Outcome
Matter adjourned pending payment of proper court fees by the plaintiff
Facts
The Plaintiff filed a suit seeking a declaration of non-indebtedness and recovery of UGX 65,280,000. The Plaintiff brought an application for leave to amend the plaint, which was granted on 19 October 2022. The Plaintiff amended the plaint to include prayers for refund of UGX 145,651,171 and special damages of UGX 2,170,242,189, bringing the total value to UGX 2,387,172,357. The Plaintiff paid UGX 6,000 as fees for the amended plaint on 31 October 2022. The Defendant raised a preliminary objection that the amended plaint should be rejected for non-payment of proper fees or the court should order payment of appropriate fees corresponding to the increased value.
Issues
- Whether court fees were paid for the amended plaint and whether they were sufficient.
Orders
- Plaintiff directed to pay the appropriate fees taking into consideration the increment in the value of the subject matter.
- The matter will proceed to hearing on payment of the said fees.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Judicature Act (Court Fees and Fines) SI No. 13-3 Rule 6
Cases cited (3)
- Okidi Richard v MTN Uganda Limited (Civil Suit No. 286 of 2010)
- Miao Hua Xian v Dfcu Bank Ltd and Another (Civil Suit No. 78 of 2016)
- Lawrence Muwanga v Stephen Kyeyune (Civil Appeal No. 12 of 2001)
Cases citing this judgment (4)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
- Chongquing International Construction Corporation Ltd v Francis Kaahwa (Civil Appeal No. 219 of 2021; Civil Application No. 192 of 2021)
- Ntambara Faustine v Mugabi Davis and 7 Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 0084 of 2025)
- Byabagambi v Mugisha and Another (Revision Application 4 of 2023)
- Katabarwa and Others v Nsubuga and Another (Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2022)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.