Wakilii

Kofi v Ghana (Communication 6 of 1988)

African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights · [1988] ACHPR 15 · 1988 Communication Inadmissible AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Communication alleging arrest and detention without trial before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights
Decision
Communication dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights declared the communication inadmissible because it was directed against Ghana, a State that was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights at the time. The Commission lacks jurisdiction over non-State parties to the Charter.

Outcome

Communication dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Facts

Dr. Kodji Kofi filed a communication dated 11 April 1988 alleging arrest and detention without trial. The communication was directed against Ghana. At the time the communication was filed and considered, Ghana was not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The African Commission considered the matter at its fourth ordinary session held from 17 to 26 October 1988.

Issues

  1. Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction to consider a communication directed against a State that is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Orders

  • Communication declared inadmissible.

Rules and key headnotes

Human Rights — Jurisdiction — African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights — Admissibility of Communications Against Non-State Parties
The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights lacks jurisdiction to consider a communication directed against a State that is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Legislation cited (2)

  • African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights art.30
  • Rules of Procedure of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights art.101

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Kofi v Ghana (Communication 6 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 15 (26 October 1988)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.