Kunaga v Real People Finance Services Limited (Miscellaneous Application 675 of 2017)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court dismissed an application seeking review of an order that had dismissed a previous review application. The court held that under Order 46 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, no application to review an order made on an application for review shall be entertained. An order rejecting a review application is not subject to further review.
Outcome
Application dismissed as misconceived
Facts
The applicant filed Civil Suit No. 3132 of 2011 at the Chief Magistrate's Court of Mengo which was dismissed with costs. She appealed in Civil Appeal No. 9 of 2013, which was also dismissed with costs. The applicant then filed an application for review (H.C. Misc. Application No. 009 of 2017) which was heard and dismissed with costs. She thereafter filed the present application (Misc. Application No. 675 of 2017) seeking to review the order that dismissed her previous review application. The applicant contended that her suit was not heard, that there was gross abuse of court process, and that she would suffer irreparable damage if the application was not granted.
Issues
- Whether an order rejecting an application for review is subject to further review under Order 46 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (2)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.