Kwesiga James v Mugisha Robert (Civil Appeal 323 of 2019)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that an appellate judge errs in law by relying on additional evidence not on the trial record and admitted without a formal application or opportunity to rebut.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kwesiga James applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.