Kwoba Yosamu v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 2 of 2000)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Robbery convictions upheld; though the trial judge breached the mandatory preliminary-hearing requirements of s.64 TID, ample other evidence of recent possession sustained the conviction.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kwoba Yosamu applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.