Wakilii
HomeCase law › Kyamanywa v Uganda (Constitutional Reference 10 of 2000)

Kyamanywa v Uganda (Constitutional Reference 10 of 2000)

Citation: [2001] UGCC 3 Court: Constitutional Court Decided: 14 December 2001 Jurisdiction: Uganda
Cited — treatment unverified cited in 6 (treatment unverified) Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.

Legal issues

Constitutional LawHuman RightsCriminal Law & ProcedureStatutory Interpretation

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

Held by majority that corporal punishment — six strokes of the cane — is cruel, inhuman and degrading, and inconsistent with Article 24 of the Constitution.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how Kyamanywa applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.