Kyeyune Joseph v Uganda [2003] UGSC 19
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that facts discovered through information from an accused are admissible under Evidence Act s.29A even where the confession itself was induced by violence.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Kyeyune Joseph applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.