Lawoko Winnie Olwe v Nalinny Dorothy and Registrar of Land Titles (Misc Application No. I29 of 2022)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application dismissed for non-appearance of the applicant and her counsel on the date fixed for hearing. The court found no justification on record for their absence and exercised its discretion under Order 9 rule 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules to dismiss the application. Costs awarded to the second respondent.
Outcome
Application dismissed for non-appearance
Facts
The application was adjourned to the hearing date for consideration in the presence of the applicant and her counsel. On the scheduled date, neither the applicant nor her counsel appeared before the court. The record contained no explanation or justification for their absence.
Orders
- Application dismissed under Order 9 rule 22 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
- Applicant to pay costs to the 2nd Respondent.
Legislation cited (1)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.