Loola Cipiriano and Another v Attorney General [2023] UGHRC 20
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The Tribunal found that UPDF soldiers subjected the complainants to torture by beating them, tying their testicles with bricks suspended, and suffocating them with polythene bags to extract confessions about alleged gun possession. The right to freedom from torture was violated. The complainants were detained for two weeks at Pabbo barracks without being brought before court within 48 hours, exceeding the lawful detention period. The Attorney General was held vicariously liable. Each complainant was awarded UGX 5,000,000 for torture and UGX 1,000,000 for illegal detention.
Outcome
Complaint allowed; complainants awarded damages for torture and illegal detention
Facts
On 1 March 2009, Loola Cipiriano and Olal Samuel were arrested by UPDF soldiers attached to Otizi army detach on allegations of illegal possession of guns. They were detained at Pabbo UPDF barracks. During detention, soldiers subjected them to severe beatings, tied their testicles with bricks suspended, placed them in a pit, and covered their faces with polythene bags to suffocate them in order to extract confessions. The complainants denied possessing guns. They were detained at Pabbo barracks for approximately two weeks before being transferred to 4th Division and then to Gulu Central Police Station, where they were held for two days before release. Medical examination by ACTV Gulu found multiple scars and post-traumatic disorder. The arrest was initiated by the LC.3 Chairperson of Pabbo and a JCC operative named Loyi, who handed the complainants to UPDF soldiers.
Issues
- Whether the complainants' right to freedom from torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment was violated by state agents.
- Whether the complainants' right to personal liberty was violated by state agents.
- Whether there are any remedies available for the complainants.
Orders
- The complaint is allowed.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the first complainant, Oola Cipriano, a total sum of UGX 6,000,000 broken down as: (a) UGX 5,000,000 as general damages for violation of his right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment; (b) UGX 1,000,000 as general damages for illegal detention.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the second complainant, Olal Samuel, a total sum of UGX 6,000,000 broken down as: (a) UGX 5,000,000 as general damages for violation of his right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment; (b) UGX 1,000,000 as general damages for illegal detention.
- The general damages shall carry interest at 10% from the date of delivery of this decision until payment in full.
- Each party shall bear their own costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (16)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 23
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 23(1)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 23(4)(a)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 23(4)(b)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 24
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 44(a)
- Constitution of the Republic of Uganda Article 53(2)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 Article 7
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 Article 9(1)
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 Article 9(3)
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights 1986 Article 4
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights 1986 Article 5
- African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights 1986 Article 6
- UN Convention Against Torture Article 1
- Evidence Act s.57
- Evidence Act s.59
Cases cited (1)
- Cullen v Clarke [1963] LR 368
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.