Lukyamuzi & Another v Oddy (Civil Appeal 18 of 1993)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that an application to attach a defendant's property before judgment lies under Order 35, not Order 37, and the defendant must be given notice and heard.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Lukyamuzi & Another applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.