Lule Bosco Malungu and Another v Mukiibi David and Another [2026] UGHCFD 83
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court overruled preliminary objections, holding that a challenge to a Certificate of No Objection may be brought by Miscellaneous Cause and that non-joinder of the Administrator General did not defeat the application. On the merits it found the Applicants had not proved their claimed relationship to the deceased, but the Respondents had likewise failed to prove theirs. The court held the Certificate of No Objection was procured through fraud, evidenced by systematic logical contradictions and the Respondents' unexplained silence, and was issued in breach of the Administrator General's duties to verify, act consistently, and observe natural justice. The Certificate was declared void ab initio and cancelled, and Letters of Administration were granted to the Applicants.
Outcome
Application granted; the Certificate of No Objection declared void and cancelled, and Letters of Administration granted to the Applicants, with the Respondents restrained from dealing with estate assets.
Facts
The Applicants, claiming to be the nephew and niece of the late Manjeri Nalweyiso Naboowa through their father (said to be the deceased's brother by a shared mother), applied to the Administrator General for a Certificate of No Objection but learned the Respondents had already opened a file. A promised meeting to harmonise the parties' interests was never held, and the Respondents obtained the Certificate without the Applicants' involvement. The Respondents claimed to be the deceased's grandnephew and grandniece, verified by the Administrator General. The Administrator General's own minutes recorded that the deceased and her sisters never gave birth, that the 1st Respondent was first rejected as nearest relative to another sister's estate yet accepted as relative to the deceased without recorded verification, and that the 2nd Respondent was added by family agreement without independent verification. The Applicants' claimed parentage conflicted with NIRA records, and file records they requested were never disclosed. The estate comprised property at Munyonyo and about 100 acres at Kakonda, with a related suit (HCCS No. 1135 of 2024) pending.
Issues
- Whether the application was a disguised judicial review application improperly commenced by Miscellaneous Cause rather than under the Judicature (Judicial Review) Rules.
- Whether the Administrator General was a necessary party whose non-joinder rendered the application incompetent.
- Whether the Applicants proved that they are beneficiaries of the estate of the late Manjeri Nalweyiso Naboowa.
- Whether the Respondents proved that they are beneficiaries of the estate.
- Whether the Certificate of No Objection Serial No. 49220 ought to be cancelled.
- Whether the requirement for a Certificate of No Objection should be dispensed with and Letters of Administration granted to the Applicants alone.
- Whether Letters of Administration should be granted jointly to the Applicants and the Respondents.
- Whether the Applicants are entitled to the costs of the application.
Orders
- The Certificate of No Objection Serial No. 49220, issued by the Administrator General to the Respondents on 2nd March 2026 in respect of the estate of the late Manjeri Nalweyiso Naboowa, is declared void and of no effect.
- The Certificate of No Objection vide Administrator-General's Cause No. 530 of 2020 is cancelled.
- The Applicants are dispensed with the requirement to obtain a fresh Certificate of No Objection.
- Letters of Administration for the estate of the late Manjeri Nalweyiso Naboowa are issued to the Applicants.
- The Respondents are restrained from dealing with, disposing of, or alienating any assets of the estate of the late Manjeri Nalweyiso Naboowa.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the Applicants.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (15)
- Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 282 s.98
- Administrator General's Act, Cap. 264 s.2(2)
- Administrator General's Act, Cap. 264 s.5(1)
- Succession Act, Cap. 268 s.2
- Succession Act, Cap. 268 s.197
- Succession Act, Cap. 268 s.202
- Succession Act, Cap. 268 s.256(1)
- Judicature Act, Cap. 16 s.14
- Judicature Act, Cap. 16 s.37
- Civil Procedure Rules, SI 71-1 Order 52 Rules 1-4
- Civil Procedure Rules, SI 71-1 Order 1 Rule 9
- Civil Procedure Rules, SI 71-1 Order 1 Rule 10(1)
- Evidence Act, Cap. 8 s.101
- Evidence Act, Cap. 8 s.102
- Evidence Act, Cap. 8 s.103
Cases cited (7)
- O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237
- The Open Forum Initiative (TOFI) v Attorney General [2022] UGHCCD 33
- Samson Sempasa v P.K. Sengendo (H.C.M.A No. 577 of 2013)
- Kololo Curing Co. Ltd v West Mengo Co-operative Union Ltd (1981) HCB 60
- Balikowa Nixion Kalungi & Anor v Electoral Commission (Miscellaneous Cause No. 180 of 2023)
- Fredrick Zaabwe v. Orient Bank (2006)
- Edward Gatsinzi v Lwanga Steven (HCCS No. 690 of 2004)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.