Wakilii

M.T.N (U) Ltd v Uganda Telecom Ltd. (Civil Appeal 13 of 2004)

Supreme Court · [2005] UGSC 10 · 2005 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Second appeal from the Court of Appeal in a contractual dispute over the date interest on an agreed debt began to accrue.
Decision
Appeal dismissed; respondent liable to pay interest of Shs. 200,552,609 with interest at court rate from the date of judgment.

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The dispute concerned the date from which contractual interest on an agreed principal debt under an interconnection agreement began to accrue. The Supreme Court held that the agreement must be construed as written, and that the issuing and receipt of an invoice was a condition precedent to payment. Because no amount falls due until an invoice specifying the net amount is received, the due date — and therefore the date interest begins to accrue — is the date the invoice is received, not an earlier date tied to receipt of traffic reports. The appeal was dismissed, the respondent being liable for interest of Shs. 200,552,609 with interest at court rate from judgment, costs to the respondent.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed; respondent liable to pay interest of Shs. 200,552,609 with interest at court rate from the date of judgment.

Facts

The appellant and respondent are telecommunications operators party to an interconnection agreement under which each charges the other for interconnection services. The appellant sued to recover a principal sum of Shs. 5,772,690,167 together with interest of Shs. 518,455,167 said to have accrued from the date the principal fell due. The parties agreed on the principal sum, and judgment for it was entered by consent. They did not agree on the amount of interest, which turned on the date interest began to accrue. The trial judge awarded interest of Shs. 518,455,167; the respondent contended the correct figure was Shs. 200,552,609. Under Article 7 of the agreement, each party reports amounts due monthly, the receiving party has 15 days to reconcile, accept or refuse traffic, and an invoice is issued upon acceptance of the reconciliation. Article 7.1.3 provides that payments not made by the due date bear interest at 10% per annum from the due date until payment.

Issues

  1. On what date did the respondent's liability to pay interest on the agreed principal debt arise, and from what date did interest begin to accrue under the parties' interconnection agreement?

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent here and in the courts below.
  • Respondent liable to pay the appellant Shs. 200,552,609 with interest at court rate from the date of judgment until payment in full.
  • Taxation of costs to be based solely on the interest sum that was in dispute.

Rules and key headnotes

Contract Law — Construction — Court construes the contract as written
A court must construe a contract according to its written terms, giving effect to the procedure and conditions the parties have expressly agreed.
Contract Law — Conditions Precedent — Invoice as precondition to payment and accrual of interest
Where a contract makes the issuing and receipt of an invoice a condition precedent to payment of a net amount, no amount falls due, and contractual interest does not begin to accrue, until the invoice specifying the amount payable is received.
Civil Procedure — Costs — Taxation confined to the matter actually in dispute
Where only a narrow issue is genuinely in dispute, taxation of costs may be confined to the subject matter actually contested rather than the whole sum claimed.

Legislation cited (1)

Cases cited (1)

  • Stirnlaw v. Southern Foundaries (1926) Ltd and another (1939) Acc.E.R.113

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

M.T.N (U) Ltd v Uganda Telecom Ltd. (Civil Appeal 13 of 2004) [2005] UGSC 10 (23 June 2005)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.