Mabale Growers Tea Factory Ltd V Noorali (Civil Appeal 2 of 2015)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the ninety-day repossession period under the Expropriated Properties Act is regulatory, not mandatory, so the Minister validly issued a later repossession certificate; appeal dismissed.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Mabale Growers Tea Factory Ltd V Noorali (Civil Appeal 2 of 2015) applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.