Home › Case law › Major General David Tinyefunza v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 1996)
Major General David Tinyefunza v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 1996)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that testimony before a Parliamentary Committee is privileged under Article 97, and a soldier appointed to public office ceases army membership, so military resignation rules cannot compel him.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Major General David Tinyefunza applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.