Home › Case law › Major General David Tinyefuza v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 1996)
Major General David Tinyefuza v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 1996)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that section 121 Evidence Act state-privilege is inconsistent with the Article 41 right of access to information, and the right to fair hearing under Article 44 is non-derogable.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Major General David Tinyefuza applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.