Home › Case law › Major General David Tinyefuza v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 1996)
Major General David Tinyefuza v Attorney General (Constitutional Petition No. 1 of 1996)
Treatment recorded in citing cases
followed in 1
Derived from citing cases in the Wakilii corpus — not an assertion that this case is good law.
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Testimony before a parliamentary committee is privileged under Article 97; appointment to full-time public service severs army membership, so military resignation rules did not apply to the petitioner.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Major General David Tinyefuza applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.