Wakilii

Makerere University v Kisambira (Labour Dispute Miscellaneous Application No. 15 of 2015)

Industrial Court · [2015] UGIC 3 · 2015 Application Partly Allowed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Application for extension of time to file reply to memorandum of claim in underlying labour dispute
Decision
Application allowed with conditions; applicant granted extension of time to file reply but ordered to pay costs

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

The Industrial Court held that while the applicant's delay in filing its reply was caused by negligence of its own employee and did not constitute sufficient cause, the application would nonetheless be allowed to enable the matter to be heard on its merits given that it touched employment matters. The applicant was granted 14 days to file its reply and ordered to pay costs of 1,500,000 shillings.

Outcome

Application allowed with conditions; applicant granted extension of time to file reply but ordered to pay costs

Facts

Makerere University applied for an extension of time to file its reply to a memorandum of claim in an underlying labour dispute. The applicant's delay was caused by its own employee (described as the secretary to the secretary) who failed to serve court process to the applicant's lawyers in time. The applicant sought to excuse the delay on grounds of employee negligence. The respondent opposed the application.

Issues

  1. Whether the time within which the applicant is allowed to file its reply to the memorandum of claim should be extended.
  2. Whether the delay in filing was caused by sufficient cause.

Orders

  • Application allowed.
  • The applicant shall file the reply within 14 days from the date of this ruling.
  • The reply shall be in consonance with the original pleadings filed on the record.
  • The applicant shall pay costs of this application in the sum of 1,500,000 shillings on or before hearing of the claim.

Rules and key headnotes

Extension of Time — Sufficient Cause — Negligence of Party's Own Employee
Negligence of a party's own employee in delivering court process does not constitute sufficient cause for extending time, as the employee's obligation to serve process in time arises from the employment relationship and the employer cannot be exonerated from responsibility for such negligence.
Extension of Time — Discretion — Employment Matters — Hearing on Merits
Where a matter touches employment issues, the court may exercise its discretion to allow an extension of time despite absence of sufficient cause, to enable the matter to be heard on its merits, subject to appropriate conditions including payment of costs.

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Makerere_University_v_Kisambira_(Labour_Dispute_Miscellaneous_Application_No._15_of_2015)_[2015]_UGIC_3_(8_September_2015)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.