Home › Case law › Male H. Mabirizi v Attorney General & Karuhanga & 5 Others v Attorney General & Uganda Law Society v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal 2 of 2018; Constitutional Appeal 3 of 2
Male H. Mabirizi v Attorney General & Karuhanga & 5 Others v Attorney General & Uganda Law Society v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal 2 of 2018; Constitutional Appeal 3 of 2
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
The presidential age qualification under Article 102(b) is not part of the Constitution's basic structure, and Parliament validly removed it without a referendum.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Male H. Mabirizi applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.