Wakilii
HomeCase law › Male H Mabirizi v Attorney General Karuhanga 5 Others v Attorney General Uganda Law Society v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal 2 of 2018 Constitutional Appeal 3 of 2018 Constitutional Appeal 4 of 2018) 2019 UGSC 102 (18 April 201

Male H Mabirizi v Attorney General Karuhanga 5 Others v Attorney General Uganda Law Society v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal 2 of 2018 Constitutional Appeal 3 of 2018 Constitutional Appeal 4 of 2018) 2019 UGSC 102 (18 April 201

Citation: [2019] UGSC 102 Court: Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Uganda

Legal issues

Constitutional LawStatutory InterpretationCivil ProcedureHuman Rights

About this case

AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.

The presidential age limit in Article 102(b) is not part of the Constitution's basic structure and was validly removed by Parliament.

Ask Wakilii about this case

Get a cited answer on how Male H Mabirizi applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.

Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.