Male v Roko Construction Ltd (Civil Suit No. 1099 of 2020)
Observed later treatment
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court Commercial Division entered judgment for the plaintiff in a debt recovery suit for UGX 135,729,745. The defendant had engaged the plaintiff to provide transport services between 2014 and 2020, issued invoices totalling over UGX 2 billion, and made partial payments leaving the claimed balance outstanding. The defendant's application for leave to defend was dismissed for failure to disclose triable issues. The court found the debt clearly established and unchallenged on the record.
Outcome
Judgment entered for plaintiff for the full amount claimed with costs
Facts
Between 2014 and 2020, the defendant engaged the plaintiff to provide transport services for aggregate stones from its quarry in Bukerere to a batch plant at Nasser Road, Kampala. The plaintiff issued invoices totalling UGX 2,150,690,775. The defendant made payments by cash and cheque between January 2015 and August 2020 totalling UGX 2,014,961,030, leaving an outstanding balance of UGX 135,729,745. Despite several reminders, the defendant refused to pay the outstanding sum. The defendant filed an application for leave to appear and defend, which was dismissed on 3 September 2021 for failure to disclose any triable issues.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff established a debt owed by the defendant for transport services rendered.
Orders
- Judgment entered against the defendant.
- Defendant to pay the plaintiff UGX 135,729,745.
- Costs of the suit to be paid by the defendant.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases citing this judgment (1)
How later Ugandan judgments in the Wakilii corpus have cited this case. Treatment labels come from Sequitur — Uganda’s citator — each backed by a verbatim span from the citing judgment, and are not an assertion that this case is, or is not, good law.
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.