Wakilii

Manyindo v Kabigabwa (HC CV CA No. 0026 of 2009)

High Court · [2012] UGHC 442 · 2012 Appeal Dismissed AI-generated summary ↓ Download Pin to watchlist Add to matter
Jurisdiction
Uganda
Case Type
Civil appeal from decision of Magistrate Grade I Fort Portal in trespass and eviction suit
Decision
Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent; judgment and orders of the Magistrate's Court upheld

Observed later treatment

No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.

Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.

AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.

Holding

Appeal dismissed. Where an appellant obtained a certificate of title for thirty acres of land allocated by a chief in 1963 but left two acres unsurveyed and unregistered, and a chief subsequently allocated those two vacant acres to the respondent in 1983, the appellant cannot claim ownership of the disputed two acres. The fact that the land was left out of the appellant's certificate of title meant it remained available for allocation.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondent; judgment and orders of the Magistrate's Court upheld

Facts

In 1963, a chief allocated thirty-two acres of land to the appellant. The appellant surveyed and obtained a certificate of title for only thirty acres, leaving two acres unsurveyed and unregistered. In 1983, another chief found the two-acre parcel vacant and allocated it to the respondent, who utilized it until 1995 when the appellant attempted to survey the land. The appellant sued the respondent in the Magistrate's Court for trespass, seeking eviction and vacant possession. The trial Magistrate found for the respondent, concluding the disputed two acres did not belong to the appellant. The appellant appealed on seven grounds to the High Court.

Issues

  1. Whether the two-acre disputed parcel of land belonged to the appellant.
  2. Whether the trial Magistrate erred in law and fact in finding that the suit land belonged to the respondent.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.
  • Judgment and orders of the lower court upheld.

Rules and key headnotes

Land Ownership — Certificate of Title — Exclusion of Land from Survey and Registration
Where a person is allocated land by a chief but obtains a certificate of title for only part of that allocation, leaving a portion unsurveyed and unregistered, that unsurveyed portion remains vacant public land available for allocation to others.
Land Allocation — Authority of Chiefs — Public Land
Chiefs have authority to allocate vacant public land, and where land has not been included in any certificate of title, it may be lawfully allocated by a chief to another person.
Appeals — First Appellate Court — Duty to Re-evaluate Evidence
A first appellate court is under a duty to subject the record of the lower court to fresh scrutiny and arrive at a just conclusion.

Cases cited (1)

  • Selle and Another v Associated Motor Boat Co Ltd [1968] EA 123

Full judgment

↓ Download PDF

The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.

Manyindo v Kabigabwa (HC CV CA No. 0026 of 2009) [2012] UGHC 442 (18 May 2012)
Source: this page presents Wakilii’s issue analysis and metadata for a publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Any AI-generated summary is marked as such. Judgment text is sourced from the Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org). Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.