Mary Katiiti Masembe v Kawempe Division of Kampala City Council (Miscellaneous Application No 71 of 2006) (Miscellaneous Application No 71 of 2006)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that the Registrar's order of 23 November 2005 did not conform to the court's ruling of 11 November 2005, which allowed the respondents to retain only six market stalls, not the entire market. The court exercised its power under section 101 of the Civil Procedure Act to nullify the non-conforming order and stopped any execution until a valid order conforming to the original ruling was made.
Outcome
Application granted; Registrar's order nullified; execution stayed pending proper order
Facts
Mary Katiiti Masembe was the judgment creditor in civil suit no. 141 of 2002 against Kawempe Division. Six respondents, claiming to be beneficiaries of their late father's estate and entitled to six market stalls, filed objector proceedings in Miscellaneous Application No. 215 of 2005. The court ruled on 11 November 2005 that the respondents could retain six stalls. Subsequently, the Registrar extracted an order dated 23 November 2005, and the Administrator General issued instructions for vacant possession of the entire market to the respondents. The applicant contended this was improper as the ruling covered only six stalls, not the entire market of over forty stalls. The respondents argued that the Administrator General was acting as administrator of the estate and that the applicant's remedy lay against the Administrator General, not them.
Issues
- Whether the execution of the court's ruling in Miscellaneous Application No. 215 of 2005 should be stopped, suspended or set aside.
- Whether the Registrar's order dated 23/11/2005 conformed to the court's ruling of 11/11/2005.
- Whether the applicant's remedy lay against the respondents or against the Administrator General.
Orders
- The Registrar's order dated 23/11/2005 is nullified.
- All execution of the ruling of 11/11/2005 is stopped until a valid and proper order conforming to that ruling has been made.
- Application allowed with costs to the applicant.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.