Massner and Another v Kayolo [2025] UGHC 251
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The High Court held that the Defendant, acting as project supervisor for his sister's building project, fraudulently misappropriated land intended for a septic tank and latrine, registering it in his own name and constructing a building on it. The court found this constituted both fraud and trespass. The Defendant's claim that he was entitled to the land as repayment for money advanced was rejected. The court ordered production of the original purchase agreement, awarded general damages totalling UGX 25,000,000, ordered demolition of the illegally constructed structures, and granted a permanent injunction against further encroachment.
Outcome
Judgment entered for the Plaintiffs with orders for production of purchase agreement, general damages totalling UGX 25,000,000, demolition of illegal structures, and permanent injunction
Facts
The Plaintiffs, a married couple living in Europe, entrusted the 1st Plaintiff's brother (the Defendant) to purchase land in Uganda and supervise construction of apartments. In 2015, the 1st Plaintiff sent UGX 23,000,000 for purchase of land measuring 100ft X 50ft at Kazo Angola. The Defendant purchased land measuring 90ft X 50ft and signed the agreement on behalf of his sister. The Defendant later purchased additional smaller parcels, ostensibly for a septic tank and latrine for the Plaintiffs' building. The Plaintiffs sent approximately UGX 600,000,000 in instalments for construction. Instead of installing the septic facilities on the additional land, the Defendant registered two parcels in his own name and constructed a building for himself, with part of the structure encroaching on the Plaintiffs' land. The Defendant's tenants used the Plaintiffs' parking space and accessed the upper floors via stairs on the Plaintiffs' property. A settlement agreement in May 2019 requiring the Defendant to construct the septic facilities and produce the original sale agreement was not honoured.
Issues
- Whether the Defendant fraudulently and illegally constructed on part of the Plaintiffs' land.
- Whether the Defendant is a trespasser on the Plaintiffs' land.
- What remedies are available to the parties.
Orders
- An order that the Defendant produce the purchase agreement for land measuring 90ft X 50ft land at Kazo Angola in favour of the Plaintiffs.
- General damages of UGX 15,000,000 for illegal construction.
- General damages for encroachment and trespass of UGX 10,000,000.
- An order for demolition of the illegally constructed structures on the Plaintiffs' land.
- An order of permanent injunction against further illegal construction, encroachment and trespass.
- Costs of the suit awarded to the Plaintiffs.
Rules and key headnotes
Cases cited (3)
- Frederick J.K Zaabwe v Orient Bank & 5 Ors (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 21 of 2007)
- Justine E M.N. Lutaaya v Sterling Civil Engineering Co (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 39 of 2005)
- Gapco (U) Ltd v A.S Ali Transporters (U) Ltd (Supreme Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2009)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.