Max (Contractors), Limited v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 1950)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Where an insurance policy covers only drivers permitted by law to drive and not disqualified, and the driver has no Certificate of Competency, the policy is not in force regardless of the owner's knowledge. The owner's ignorance of the driver's disqualification is immaterial. The strict wording of the policy exceptions clause operates absolutely without requiring knowledge on the part of the insured.
Outcome
Appellant company's conviction for permitting use of uninsured motor vehicle upheld
Facts
The appellant company employed an Asian driver who, unknown to them, had no Certificate of Competency to drive. The company held an insurance policy covering any person driving on their order or with permission, provided the driver was permitted by law to drive and not disqualified. The driver operated the vehicle without the required certificate. The company was prosecuted and convicted under section 4(1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Ordinance, 1945 for permitting use of an uninsured motor vehicle. The magistrate found that because the driver was unqualified, the insurance policy was not in force at the time.
Issues
- Whether an insurance policy was in force where the driver had no Certificate of Competency and the policy covered only persons permitted by law to drive.
- Whether the owner's ignorance of the driver's lack of qualification was material to liability under section 4(1) of the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Ordinance, 1945.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Conviction upheld.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Ordinance, 1945 s.4(1)
Cases cited (1)
- John T. Ellis Ltd v Hinds [1947] 1 All ER 337
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.