Mayiga Samuel v Kaggwa Henry and Another (Misc. Application No. 188 of 2025)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that an application for contempt of court brought by the legal representative of a deceased applicant against the same respondents on the same subject matter as a previously determined contempt application constitutes abuse of court process. The application was dismissed where the applicant sought identical orders for contempt based on the same facts and against the same parties already adjudicated in an earlier application.
Outcome
Application dismissed for abuse of court process
Facts
The applicant, as legal representative of the late Abiather Ddamulira Mukasa, brought an application for contempt of court against the respondents alleging they violated a temporary injunction order by occupying suit land comprised in Block 260 Plot 1077 at Kyetugiro, constructing structures, and changing the status quo. The deceased had previously filed Misc. Application No. 3864 of 2023 seeking contempt orders against the same 1st respondent and other parties based on similar allegations. That earlier application was determined with the 1st respondent not found in contempt as he was in possession before the injunction was issued. The 2nd respondent acquired his interest from the 1st respondent on 1 March 2023, before the temporary injunction was granted on 11 October 2023.
Issues
- Whether the instant application amounts to an abuse of court process
- Whether the instant application raises grounds for contempt of court
Orders
- Application dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (13)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 128(2)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 128(3)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 50(2)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 28(12)
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23(1)(a)
- Judicature Act s.14
- Judicature Act s.37
- Civil Procedure Act s.64(c)
- Civil Procedure Act s.64(e)
- Civil Procedure Act s.98
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 rule 1
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 rule 2
- Civil Procedure Rules Order 52 rule 3
Cases cited (2)
- African Renaissance Corporation v JDP Construction Ltd (2003)
- King's College Buddo Staff Savings Scheme Ltd v Zaverio Samula and Others (HCCS No. 26 of 2020)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.