Merali v Rex (Cr. App. 47-1929)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that registration under the Registration of Business Names Ordinance is necessary for lorries trading on the road, and the road between the places to which the lorries ply can be regarded as the place of business for purposes of the Ordinance. Statements made by the accused in bankruptcy proceedings in the presence of the Official Receiver are admissible evidence in a criminal prosecution. Appeal dismissed.
Outcome
Conviction and sentence upheld
Facts
The appellant was convicted by the Resident Magistrate, Nairobi, under the Registration of Business Names Ordinance for failing to register that he was carrying on business in the name of his son, a minor. The appellant admitted trading in his son's name. The Registrar under the Ordinance gave evidence that the appellant had not registered his business as required. The appellant operated lorries trading on the road between various places.
Issues
- Whether registration under the Registration of Business Names Ordinance is required for lorries trading on the road.
- Whether the road between places to which lorries ply can be regarded as a place of business for purposes of the Ordinance.
- Whether statements made by the accused in bankruptcy proceedings are admissible evidence in a criminal prosecution.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Finding and sentence of the Resident Magistrate confirmed.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (1)
- Registration of Business Names Ordinance (Cap. 92) s.3
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.