Mohamerbhai v Hon. Commissioner of Lands for the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya (C.C. No - 14-1936 (Mombasa))
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
The court held that once the Governor's fiat is obtained under Cap. 17 of the Laws of Kenya, a petition of right proceeds as an ordinary civil action governed by the Civil Procedure Ordinance and Rules of Court. Since Kenya's civil procedure does not recognize demurrer, the Attorney General cannot enter a demurrer in such proceedings. The demurrer was struck out with costs.
Outcome
Demurrer struck out; defendant ordered to enter appearance and file defence
Facts
The plaintiff, as trustee of the Bohra Community of Lamu, instituted a plaint against the defendant claiming ownership of certain lands in Kenya and damages of Sh. 200 for a door allegedly removed by a district commissioner. The plaint was endorsed with the Governor's fiat under Cap. 17 s.5 of the Laws of Kenya. The Attorney General, on behalf of the Government, entered a demurrer to the plaint. The plaintiff moved to strike out the demurrer and for an order that the defendant file a defence.
Issues
- Whether the Attorney General can enter a demurrer in a petition of right claim against the Government of Kenya under Cap. 17 of the Laws of Kenya.
Orders
- Motion allowed with costs.
- Demurrer struck out.
- Defendant at liberty to enter an appearance within ten days.
- Defendant to file a defence within ten days of entering appearance.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
- Laws of Kenya Cap. 17 s.3
- Laws of Kenya Cap. 17 s.4
- Laws of Kenya Cap. 17 s.5
- Laws of Kenya Cap. 17 s.8
- Civil Procedure Ordinance 1924
Cases cited (1)
- Rainey v The General Manager, Uganda Railway (9 E.A.L.R. 58)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.