Mohan Singh Bharj V Attorney General (High Court Civil Suit No. 647 of 1999 ) (High Court Civil Suit No. 647 of 1999)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that a landlord's claim for rent arrears is based on the tenancy agreement read together with any addendum signed on the same date. Where Government occupied premises under a tenancy agreement that provided for rent revision upon completion of repairs, and the tenant effected such repairs, the revised rent became payable for the remainder of the tenancy period. Government was liable for water bills incurred during the tenancy period but not for a period beyond the tenancy when its agent held over without Government's knowledge or acquiescence.
Outcome
Judgment entered for the plaintiff with awards for rent arrears, water bills, general damages and interest
Facts
The plaintiff was the owner of premises that had been expropriated property. On 3 March 1995, he entered a two-year tenancy agreement with the President's Office effective from 1 December 1994, at a monthly rent of UGX 2,500,000 payable quarterly in advance. An addendum to the agreement provided that when the plaintiff effected specified repairs, the rent would be revised to UGX 3,000,000 per month. The plaintiff effected the repairs by November 1995. By 30 November 1996 when the tenancy expired, Government had paid only UGX 46,500,000, leaving a balance of UGX 19,500,000. Government's agent, Major General Elly Tumwine, remained in occupation until 21 September 1997, ten months beyond the tenancy period. Water bills totalling UGX 2,597,079 accrued during and after the tenancy period, remaining unpaid. The plaintiff claimed rent arrears, holding-over rent, water bills and general damages.
Issues
- Whether the plaintiff had power to enter into a tenancy agreement with any one in respect of the suit premises?
- Whether there is some outstanding rent in respect of the suit premises?
- Whether there was holding over of the tenancy by the defendant?
- Whether the defendant was liable to pay water bills?
- What remedies are available?
Orders
- The defendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of UGX 19,500,000 as arrears of rent for the period 1 December 1994 to 30 November 1996.
- The defendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of UGX 1,378,163 as water bills for the period 1 December 1994 to 30 November 1996.
- The defendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of UGX 2,000,000 as general damages for breach of contract.
- The defendant shall pay interest on the rent arrears at Uganda Commercial Bank rate from 1 December 1994 until payment in full.
- The defendant shall pay interest on general damages at court rate from the date of judgment until payment in full.
- The defendant shall bear the costs of the suit.
Rules and key headnotes
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.