Mpata v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application 4 of 1955)
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Held that an accused person aged 65 years, charged with murder, qualifies for bail on grounds of advanced age under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution of Uganda 1995. In Uganda, life expectancy is between 50 and 55 years, and the applicant's age of 65 is far above the ordinary age of an ordinary Ugandan. His physical appearance indicated he may not endure harsh prison conditions for long. The state did not oppose the application. Bail granted with conditions including cash deposit and monthly reporting.
Outcome
Accused released on bail pending trial
Facts
The applicant, Buniri Mpata, aged 65 years, was charged with two counts of murder contrary to section 183 of the Penal Code Act. He applied for bail under section 141 of the Trial on Indictments Decree. The police charge sheet recorded his age as 60 years. The state did not oppose the bail application. The court noted that Uganda's life expectancy is between 50 and 55 years, and the applicant's physical appearance indicated he might not endure harsh prison conditions for long due to his advanced age.
Issues
- Whether the applicant, aged 65 years and charged with murder, satisfied the conditions for release on bail on grounds of advanced age.
Orders
- Application for bail granted.
- Applicant to deposit cash of Shs. 300,000/= in court.
- Sureties Christopher Balaba and Patrick Kambula each to sign a bond of Shs. 1,000,000/= not cash.
- Applicant to report to the Chief Magistrate's Court Jinja once a month for extension of bail starting from 8/4/1996 until further legal order.
- Failure to comply with any condition without reasonable explanation will result in automatic cancellation of bail.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (3)
- Trial on Indictments Decree s.141
- Penal Code Act s.183
- Constitution of Uganda 1995 Article 23(6)(c)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.