Mpuqa Rukidi v Iguru and Others (Civil Appeal 18 OF 94)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
A photocopied royal will, valid though unattested and admissible as secondary evidence, validly nominated Prince Iguru as Omukama; any son of the Omukama could succeed regardless of his mother.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Mpuqa Rukidi applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.