Mugerwa v Muzzha [2025] UGHC 250
Observed later treatment
No later-treatment classification is recorded for this judgment.
Citator coverage is limited to judgments in the Wakilii corpus and source-matched treatment records. Absence of a signal is not an assertion that the case remains good law.
AI-generated summary. This summary was generated by AI from the full text of the judgment. It may contain errors or omissions—always read the source judgment before relying on it.
Holding
Application to set aside ex parte judgment dismissed. The court found that the applicant's affidavit contained a blatant lie — he claimed never to have been served and never to have filed a defence, yet the court record showed a Written Statement of Defence filed on his behalf by his advocates. Affidavits containing fundamental falsehoods render applications untenable.
Outcome
Application dismissed for containing fundamental falsehood in supporting affidavit
Facts
The applicant, Mugerwa Geoffrey, applied to set aside an ex parte judgment in Civil Suit No. 468 of 2021. He claimed he was never served with summons to file a defence and only learned of the suit when the respondent threatened eviction. The respondent opposed, stating that the applicant was duly represented by M/S Ambrose Tebyasa & Co. Advocates who filed a joint Written Statement of Defence on 23 June 2021 on behalf of both the applicant and Millennium Estates Developers Ltd. The court record confirmed the existence of this defence.
Issues
- Whether the application to set aside the ex parte judgment should be granted where the applicant claimed non-service of summons.
- Whether an application founded on an affidavit containing a fundamental falsehood can succeed.
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs.
Rules and key headnotes
Legislation cited (5)
Cases cited (1)
- Besigye Kiiza v Museveni Yoweri Kaguta and Another (Supreme Court Constitutional Appeal No. 1 of 2001)
Full judgment
The original judgment as reported. Read the original PDF before relying on any passage.