Mugisha David Luke v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. O350 of 2017)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that a plea of guilty is equivocal where the accused is not made to admit each ingredient and the facts read do not support the charge.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Mugisha David Luke applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.