Muhammed Ali Kigozi v Gidudu Moses (Civil Appeal No.85 of 2015)
Legal issues
About this case
AI-generated summary — verify against the full judgment before relying on it.
Held that the High Court wrongly rejected expert and secondary evidence; once corrected, the vendor retained no title to pass to later purchasers, so the appeal succeeds.
Ask Wakilii about this case
Get a cited answer on how Muhammed Ali Kigozi applies to your facts, grounded in Ugandan statutes and case law.
Research this case →
Source: this page presents Wakilii's issue analysis and metadata for a
publicly reported Ugandan judgment. Judgment text is sourced from the
Uganda Legal Information Institute (ulii.org).
Wakilii is not affiliated with ULII.